map Posted June 3 Report Share Posted June 3 @phazed Type @ Then without a space type the username - in my case MAP As you type the username the forum will offer matches as you type more letters. Select the username then hit Enter/Return Have a go - it’s pretty intuitive once you make a start. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phazed Posted June 3 Author Report Share Posted June 3 @map Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
map Posted June 3 Report Share Posted June 3 Just now, phazed said: @map So that works then 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phazed Posted June 3 Author Report Share Posted June 3 1 minute ago, map said: So that works then 👍 What are your thoughts regarding mapping. put the video up so you can get a feel of the performance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
map Posted June 3 Report Share Posted June 3 10 minutes ago, phazed said: Put the video up so you can get a feel of the performance. Seems to go well from 5k rpm onwards. Watching the in car - and traffic will account for some of this - the engine seems to be dropping below 4.5k rpm in a number of places. As you know you’re then relying on torque to get the car moving. This was highlighted when you used 2nd (rather than 3rd) through Mclaren/Clark - in 2nd your 986 properly scampered onto Brabham compared to previous laps. I’d be keen to keep the car at 5k+ throughout apart from warm up/cool down laps. It looked pretty busy out there and yet there maybe more speed to be found with some mid-engine specific tweaks to some of the lines. 18 minutes ago, phazed said: What are your thoughts regarding mapping. It would benefit from someone who knows their stuff refining the map on a dyno to maximise the available performance. If they will road refine then so much the better. I’d be looking for more punch from 5.5/6k rpm - it’s interesting that from 2nd-3rd-4th out of Mclaren/Clark the engine’s in gear acceleration to 7k seems faster than when running from 3rd-4th in the same sector. More lively, responsive. So there’s possibly something in a mapping session to wake up the throttle response from 4k plus. The factory accelerator:TB mapping is pretty conservative - in my experience there’s much to be gained in terms of responsiveness from having that area of the mapping made more “assertive”. You won’t see it as bhp but you’ll definitely feel the effects on track. Hope this is helpful - happy to try and provide more detail if you want that. As and aside: Do you have a lightweight flywheel fitted? Are the exhaust manifolds equal length? Are you using Super Unleaded? What is your brake system config? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phazed Posted June 3 Author Report Share Posted June 3 Thanks for all that, very useful. in no particular order. GT3 brake/air deflectors, DS2500 pads, high temp fluid. Yes, super unleaded. No lightweight fly. Manifolds as below. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.